Journal of Biomolecular NMR 2008-10-01

Direct methods and residue type specific isotope labeling in NMR structure determination and model-driven sequential assignment.

Andreas Schedlbauer, Renate Auer, Karin Ledolter, Martin Tollinger, Karin Kloiber, Roman Lichtenecker, Simon Ruedisser, Ulrich Hommel, Walther Schmid, Robert Konrat, Georg Kontaxis

Index: J. Biomol. NMR 42(2) , 111-27, (2008)

Full Text: HTML

Abstract

Direct methods in NMR based structure determination start from an unassigned ensemble of unconnected gaseous hydrogen atoms. Under favorable conditions they can produce low resolution structures of proteins. Usually a prohibitively large number of NOEs is required, to solve a protein structure ab-initio, but even with a much smaller set of distance restraints low resolution models can be obtained which resemble a protein fold. One problem is that at such low resolution and in the absence of a force field it is impossible to distinguish the correct protein fold from its mirror image. In a hybrid approach these ambiguous models have the potential to aid in the process of sequential backbone chemical shift assignment when (13)C(beta) and (13)C' shifts are not available for sensitivity reasons. Regardless of the overall fold they enhance the information content of the NOE spectra. These, combined with residue specific labeling and minimal triple-resonance data using (13)C(alpha) connectivity can provide almost complete sequential assignment. Strategies for residue type specific labeling with customized isotope labeling patterns are of great advantage in this context. Furthermore, this approach is to some extent error-tolerant with respect to data incompleteness, limited precision of the peak picking, and structural errors caused by misassignment of NOEs.