Andy Parrish, Marc Blockman
Index: S. Afr. Med. J. 103(6) , 365-7, (2013)
Full Text: HTML
Recent trials have failed to demonstrate a survival benefit from the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) as a colloid in fluid resuscitation and have raised concerns of renal harm. In severe sepsis, there is a concerning signal of increased mortality. New high-quality systematic reviews consistently demonstrate a statistically non-significant relative risk of death of 1.08 - 1.10 and a significant 25% increased chance of requiring renal replacement therapy. The HES literature contains many industry-affiliated reviews of indifferent quality. Traditional efficacy confidence limits may warrant re-evaluation when considering these harms. Newer formulations of HES and more focused indications for use show benefit on surrogate endpoints, but these trials are currently underpowered to ensure safety.
| Structure | Name/CAS No. | Molecular Formula | Articles |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Hydroxyethyl starch
CAS:9005-27-0 |
C22H44O17 |
|
Uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock results in a hypercoagulable ...
2013-07-01 [J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 75(1) , 129-34, (2013)] |
|
Time to assess alternatives to hydroxyethyl starch to use in...
2013-01-01 [BMJ 347 , f4651, (2013)] |
|
Physiological levels of A-, B- and C-type natriuretic peptid...
2013-05-01 [Basic Res. Cardiol. 108(3) , 347, (2013)] |
|
Europe recommends ban on common plasma substitute.
2013-06-01 [BMJ 346 , f3942, (2013)] |
|
Meta-analyses of hydroxyethyl starch for volume resuscitatio...
2013-06-05 [JAMA 309(21) , 2209, (2013)] |
Home | MSDS/SDS Database Search | Journals | Product Classification | Biologically Active Compounds | Selling Leads | About Us | Disclaimer
Copyright © 2024 ChemSrc All Rights Reserved
