British Journal of Nutrition 2013-09-14

Liver and muscle glycogen repletion using 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy following ingestion of maltodextrin, galactose, protein and amino acids.

Eva Detko, John P O'Hara, Peter E Thelwall, Fiona E Smith, Djordje G Jakovljevic, Roderick F G J King, Michael I Trenell

Index: Br. J. Nutr. 110(5) , 848-55, (2013)

Full Text: HTML

Abstract

The present study evaluated whether the inclusion of protein (PRO) and amino acids (AA) within a maltodextrin (MD) and galactose (GAL) recovery drink enhanced post-exercise liver and muscle glycogen repletion. A total of seven trained male cyclists completed two trials, separated by 7 d. Each trial involved 2 h of standardised intermittent cycling, followed by 4 h recovery. During recovery, one of two isoenergetic formulations, MD-GAL (0.9 g MD/kg body mass (BM) per h and 0.3 g GAL/kg BM per h) or MD-GAL-PRO+AA (0.5 g MD/kg BM per h, 0.3 g GAL/kg BM per h, 0.4 g whey PRO hydrolysate plus l-leucine and l-phenylalanine/kg BM per h) was ingested at every 30 min. Liver and muscle glycogen were measured after depletion exercise and at the end of recovery using 1H-13C-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Despite higher postprandial insulin concentations for MD-GAL-PRO+AA compared with MD-GAL (61.3 (se 6.2) v. 29.6 (se 3.0) mU/l, (425.8 (se 43.1) v. 205.6 (se 20.8) pmol/l) P= 0.03), there were no significant differences in post-recovery liver (195.3 (se 2.6) v. 213.8 (se 18.0) mmol/l) or muscle glycogen concentrations (49.7 (se 4.0) v. 51.1 (se 7.9) mmol/l). The rate of muscle glycogen repletion was significantly higher for MD-GAL compared with MD-GAL-PRO+AA (5.8 (se 0.7) v. 3.7 (se 0.6) mmol/l per h, P= 0.04), while there were no significant differences in the rate of liver glycogen repletion (15.0 (se 2.5) v. 13.0 (se 2.7) mmol/l per h). PRO and AA within a MD-GAL recovery drink, compared with an isoenergetic mix of MD-GAL, did not enhance but matched liver and muscle glycogen recovery. This suggests that the increased postprandial insulinaemia only compensated for the lower MD content in the MD-GAL-PRO+AA treatment.