R Danczyk, B Krieder, A North, T Webster, H HogenEsch, A Rundell
Index: Biotechnol. Bioeng. 84(2) , 215-23, (2003)
Full Text: HTML
This study investigates the influence of antibody immobilization methods on antigen capture. Adsorption and two surface chemistries, an aminosilane chemistry and a common heterobifunctional crosslinker (N-gamma-maleimidobutyryloxy-succinimide ester, GMBS), were compared and evaluated for their ability to immobilize antibodies and capture antigen. The role of protein A as an orienting protein scaffold component in each of these techniques was also evaluated. Through experimentation it was determined that the GMBS technique immobilized the highest amount of antibody and minimized nonspecific binding. For all techniques, the most functional antibodies were found to be those immobilized with protein A. Interestingly, the aminosilane technique demonstrated the highest antigen capture with antibody alone but also exhibited the highest level of nonspecific binding.Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals.
Structure | Name/CAS No. | Molecular Formula | Articles |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
gmbs
CAS:80307-12-6 |
C12H12N2O6 |
Highly efficient capture and harvest of circulating tumor ce...
2015-04-01 [Biomed. Microdevices 17(2) , 39, (2015)] |
A chitosan coated monolith for nucleic acid capture in a the...
2014-07-01 [Biomicrofluidics 8(4) , 044109, (2014)] |
Expansion of CTCs from early stage lung cancer patients usin...
2014-12-15 [Oncotarget 5(23) , 12383-97, (2015)] |
Investigation on the reaction conditions of Staphylococcus a...
2014-08-01 [Anticancer Res. 34(8) , 4521-7, (2014)] |
Developing a programmed restriction endonuclease for highly ...
2005-01-01 [Nucleic Acids Res. 33(22) , 7039-47, (2005)] |
Home | MSDS/SDS Database Search | Journals | Product Classification | Biologically Active Compounds | Selling Leads | About Us | Disclaimer
Copyright © 2024 ChemSrc All Rights Reserved