Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2003-02-05

Optimization and validation of conventional and micellar LC methods for the analysis of methyltestosterone in sugar-coated pills.

R Gonzalo-Lumbreras, R Izquierdo-Hornillos

Index: J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 31(1) , 201-8, (2003)

Full Text: HTML

Abstract

Two isocratic liquid chromatographic methods (conventional and micellar) for the determination of methyltestosterone in sugar-coated pills using fluoxymesterone as internal standard have been developed and validated. In conventional liquid chromatography a mobile phase 45% water:acetonitrile 55% (v:v), a flow-rate 1 mlmin(-1) and a C(18) Hypersil ODS (250 x 4.6 mm, 5 microm) column (25 degrees C) were used. In micellar liquid chromatography the conditions were: mobile phase 40 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate: 10% propanol, flow-rate 0.5 mlmin(-1) and C(18) Hypersil ODS (150 x 3.0 mm, 5 microm) column (60 degrees C). For both methods, UV absorbance detection at 245 nm was used and a separation up to base line was achieved. Prior to HPLC analysis a simple sample preparation was required.


Related Compounds

Related Articles:

Rat liver lysosomal and mitochondrial activities are modified by anabolic-androgenic steroids.

1999-02-01

[Med. Sci Sports Exerc. 31 , 243, (1999)]

Biotransformation of 17-alkyl steroids in the equine: high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric and gas chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis of fluoxymesterone metabolites in urine samples.

1997-12-19

[J. Chromatogr. B. Biomed. Sci. Appl. 704 , 119, (1997)]

Comparison of chemotherapy with chemohormonal therapy as first-line therapy for metastatic, hormone-sensitive breast cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

2000-01-01

[J. Clin. Oncol. 18(2) , 262-6, (2000)]

Sample size calculations for the two-sample problem using the multiplicative intensity model.

2001-02-28

[Stat. Med. 20(4) , 557-79, (2001)]

Toxic effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids in primary rat hepatic cell cultures.

1995-08-01

[J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 33(4) , 187-95, (1995)]

More Articles...