Solid-phase microextraction versus single-drop microextraction for the analysis of nitroaromatic explosives in water samples.
E Psillakis, N Kalogerakis
Index: J. Chromatogr. A. 938(1-2) , 113-20, (2001)
Full Text: HTML
Abstract
This paper compares solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a recently developed extraction method called single-drop microextraction (SDME) for the analysis of nitroaromatic explosives in water samples. The two techniques are examined in terms of procedure, chromatographic analysis and method performance. All practical considerations for both techniques are also reviewed. SPME requires dedicated apparatus and is relatively expensive, as the fiber's lifetime is limited. However, it has the advantages over SDME that it can be easily used for headspace analysis and has lower detection limits for all the target analytes. SDME requires more elaborate manual operations, thus affecting linearity and precision.
Related Compounds
Related Articles:
2011-04-01
[Chemosphere 83(3) , 287-94, (2011)]
2005-12-01
[Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 69(3) , 321-5, (2005)]
Effect of soil organic matter chemistry on sorption of trinitrotoluene and 2,4-dinitrotoluene.
2010-01-15
[J. Hazard. Mater. 173(1-3) , 343-8, (2010)]
2000-04-01
[Electrophoresis 21(7) , 1395-404, (2000)]
2004-02-05
[J. Chromatogr. B. Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 800(1-2) , 75-82, (2004)]