Comparisons of phenotype and immunomodulatory capacity among rhesus bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, multipotent adult progenitor cells, and dermal fibroblasts.
Gregory M Sindberg, Beth A Lindborg, Qi Wang, Christina Clarkson, Melanie Graham, Robert Donahue, Bernhard J Hering, Catherine M Verfaillie, Pratima Bansal-Pakala, Timothy D O'Brien
Index: J. Med. Primatol. 43(4) , 231-41, (2014)
Full Text: HTML
Abstract
Potent immunomodulatory effects have been reported for mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPCs), and fibroblasts. However, side-by-side comparisons of these cells specifically regarding immunophenotype, gene expression, and suppression of proliferation of CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocyte populations have not been reported.We developed MAPC and MSC lines from rhesus macaque bone marrow and fibroblast cell lines from rhesus dermis and assessed phenotypes based upon differentiation potential, flow cytometric analysis of immunophenotype, and quantitative RT-PCR analysis of gene expression. Using allogeneic lymphocyte proliferation assays, we compared the in vitro immunomodulatory potency of each cell type.Extensive phenotypic similarities exist among each cell type, although immunosuppressive potencies are distinct. MAPCs are most potent, and fibroblasts are the least potent cell type. All three cell types demonstrated immunomodulatory capacity such that each may have potential therapeutic applications such as in organ transplantation, where reduced local immune response is desirable.© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Related Compounds
Related Articles:
MHC class II presentation is controlled by the lysosomal small GTPase, Arl8b.
2015-03-01
[J. Immunol. 194(5) , 2079-88, (2015)]
2015-03-01
[Tissue Eng. Part A 21(5-6) , 948-59, (2015)]
2015-03-01
[J. Neurooncol. 122(1) , 21-33, (2015)]
2014-08-15
[J. Immunol. 193(4) , 1717-27, (2014)]
2015-02-01
[J. Clin. Invest. 125(2) , 752-68, (2015)]