mBio 2014-01-01

Metagenome-wide association of microbial determinants of host phenotype in Drosophila melanogaster.

John M Chaston, Peter D Newell, Angela E Douglas

Index: MBio 5(5) , e01631-14, (2014)

Full Text: HTML

Abstract

Animal-associated bacteria (microbiota) affect host behaviors and physiological traits. To identify bacterial genetic determinants of microbiota-responsive host traits, we employed a metagenome-wide association (MGWA) approach in two steps. First, we measured two microbiota-responsive host traits, development time and triglyceride (TAG) content, in Drosophila melanogaster flies monoassociated with each of 41 bacterial strains. The effects of monoassociation on host traits were not confined to particular taxonomic groups. Second, we clustered protein-coding sequences of the bacteria by sequence similarity de novo and statistically associated the magnitude of the host trait with the bacterial gene contents. The animals had been monoassociated with genome-sequenced bacteria, so the metagenome content was unambiguous. This analysis showed significant effects of pyrroloquinoline quinone biosynthesis genes on development time, confirming the results of a published transposon mutagenesis screen, thereby validating the MGWA; it also identified multiple genes predicted to affect host TAG content, including extracellular glucose oxidation pathway components. To test the validity of the statistical associations, we expressed candidate genes in a strain that lacks them. Monoassociation with bacteria that ectopically expressed a predicted oxidoreductase or gluconate dehydrogenase conferred reduced Drosophila TAG contents relative to the TAG contents in empty vector controls. Consistent with the prediction that glucose oxidation pathway gene expression increased bacterial glucose utilization, the glucose content of the host diet was reduced when flies were exposed to these strains. Our findings indicate that microbiota affect host nutritional status through modulation of nutrient acquisition. Together, these findings demonstrate the utility of MGWA for identifying bacterial determinants of host traits and provide mechanistic insight into how gut microbiota modulate the nutritional status of a model host.To understand how certain gut bacteria promote the health of their animal hosts, we need to identify the bacterial genes that drive these beneficial relationships. This task is challenging because the bacterial communities can vary widely among different host individuals. To overcome this difficulty, we quantified how well each of 41 bacterial species protected Drosophila fruit flies from high fat content. The genomes of the chosen bacterial strains were previously sequenced, so we could statistically associate specific bacterial genes with bacterially mediated reduction in host fat content. Bacterial genes that promote glucose utilization were strongly represented in the association, and introducing these genes into the gut bacteria was sufficient to lower the animal's fat content. Our method is applicable to the study of many other host-microbe interactions as a way to uncover microbial genes important for host health.Copyright © 2014 Chaston et al.


Related Compounds

Related Articles:

Salicylic acid signaling controls the maturation and localization of the arabidopsis defense protein ACCELERATED CELL DEATH6.

2014-08-01

[Mol. Plant 7(8) , 1365-83, (2014)]

Transcriptional regulation of Munc13-4 expression in cytotoxic lymphocytes is disrupted by an intronic mutation associated with a primary immunodeficiency.

2014-06-02

[J. Exp. Med. 211(6) , 1079-91, (2014)]

Irisin stimulates muscle growth-related genes and regulates adipocyte differentiation and metabolism in humans.

2012-07-01

[Int. J. Obes. 38(12) , 1538-44, (2014)]

Epigenetic reprogramming of the type III interferon response potentiates antiviral activity and suppresses tumor growth.

2014-01-01

[PLoS Biol. 12(1) , e1001758, (2014)]

Mechanism of human PTEN localization revealed by heterologous expression in Dictyostelium.

2014-12-11

[Oncogene 33(50) , 5688-96, (2014)]

More Articles...