Anders Fallang, Stig Larsen, Tor E Horsberg
Index: Pest Manag. Sci. 62(3) , 208-13, (2006)
Full Text: HTML
The interpretation and importance of comparing field values of susceptibility to pesticides with a laboratory reference strain that might bear little resemblance to the actual situation in the field are problematic and a continuing subject of debate. In this paper a procedure for defining a 'normal sensitive' population from a field study of 383 individuals to provide a basis for analysing and interpreting in vitro results is described and examined. Instead of using only the 95th percentile, the upper and lower confidence limits for the 95th percentile were also compared to select the best estimation of the limit for the normal material. A field population constrained by the upper confidence limit for the 95th percentile provides appropriate descriptions of the normal material in this study. This approach should prove useful in studies of pesticide resistance in field populations.
Structure | Name/CAS No. | Molecular Formula | Articles |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Azamethiphos
CAS:35575-96-3 |
C9H10ClN2O5PS |
Albumin binding as a potential biomarker of exposure to mode...
2008-06-01 [Biol. Cell 13 , 343-63, (2008)] |
Evaluation of insecticidal efficiency of certain new selecti...
1992-12-01 [J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 22(3) , 839-49, (1992)] |
Characterisation of esterases as potential biomarkers of pes...
2008-03-01 [Environ. Pollut. 152(2) , 342-50, (2008)] |
Effect of synergists on the oral and topical toxicity of aza...
1992-08-01 [J. Econ. Entomol. 85(4) , 1041-5, (1992)] |
The lethality of Salmosan (Azamethiphos) to American lobster...
1999-06-01 [Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 43(2) , 165-9, (1999)] |
Home | MSDS/SDS Database Search | Journals | Product Classification | Biologically Active Compounds | Selling Leads | About Us | Disclaimer
Copyright © 2024 ChemSrc All Rights Reserved