E Psillakis, N Kalogerakis
Index: J. Chromatogr. A. 938(1-2) , 113-20, (2001)
Full Text: HTML
This paper compares solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a recently developed extraction method called single-drop microextraction (SDME) for the analysis of nitroaromatic explosives in water samples. The two techniques are examined in terms of procedure, chromatographic analysis and method performance. All practical considerations for both techniques are also reviewed. SPME requires dedicated apparatus and is relatively expensive, as the fiber's lifetime is limited. However, it has the advantages over SDME that it can be easily used for headspace analysis and has lower detection limits for all the target analytes. SDME requires more elaborate manual operations, thus affecting linearity and precision.
| Structure | Name/CAS No. | Molecular Formula | Articles |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
2,3-dinitrotoluene
CAS:602-01-7 |
C7H6N2O4 |
|
Evaluation of the dependence of aqueous solubility of nitro ...
2011-04-01 [Chemosphere 83(3) , 287-94, (2011)] |
|
TNT and nitroaromatic compounds are chemoattractants for Bur...
2005-12-01 [Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 69(3) , 321-5, (2005)] |
|
Effect of soil organic matter chemistry on sorption of trini...
2010-01-15 [J. Hazard. Mater. 173(1-3) , 343-8, (2010)] |
|
In-line coupling capillary electrochromatography with ampero...
2000-04-01 [Electrophoresis 21(7) , 1395-404, (2000)] |
|
Express analysis of explosives, chemical warfare agents and ...
2004-02-05 [J. Chromatogr. B. Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 800(1-2) , 75-82, (2004)] |
Home | MSDS/SDS Database Search | Journals | Product Classification | Biologically Active Compounds | Selling Leads | About Us | Disclaimer
Copyright © 2024 ChemSrc All Rights Reserved
