Ana Carolina Masarolo Machado, Leandro Cardoso, William Cunha Brandt, Guilherme Elias Pessanha Henriques, Mauro Antonio de Arruda Nóbilo
Index: J. Craniofac. Surg. 22(6) , 2332-6, (2011)
Full Text: HTML
The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of generated stress around implants and adjacent bone tissue using different implant-retained overdenture designs through photoelastic analysis.Over an edentulous human mandible, achieved from a human model, 2 or 4 microunit analog abutments were embedded (Master; Conexao Systems Prosthodontics, São Paulo, Brazil), settled in the interforaminal region. Three models of photoelastic resin (Araltec Chemicals Ltda, Hunstman, Guarulhos, São Paulo, Brazil), with 2 or 4 incorporated implants and microunit abutments, were obtained from molds using silicone for duplication. Inclusion, finishing, and polishing procedures were applied on the frameworks. This study was based on 3 different mechanisms of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: O'ring (GI), bar-clip (GII) (both with 2 implants), and their association (GIII) (with 4 implants). After the adaptation of each overdenture system on the photoelastic models, 100-N alternate occlusal loads were applied on back-side and front-side regions. The photoelastic analysis was made with the aid of a plain polariscope linked to a digital camera, Sony Cybershot α100, which allowed visualization of the fringes and registration of images on digital photographs.The results demonstrated higher tension concentrated over the GIII, with a flat distribution of stress to the posterior ridge and overload on the posterior implants. GI showed the smaller stress level, and GII, intermediate level; there was distribution of stress to the posterior ridge in these 2 groups.The use of bar attachment proved to be a better alternative, because it showed a moderate level of tension with a more uniform stress distribution and possessed higher retention than did the ball system.
Structure | Name/CAS No. | Molecular Formula | Articles |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
hexahydrophthalic anhydride
CAS:85-42-7 |
C8H10O3 |
Optimization of a histopathological biomarker for sphingomye...
2012-08-01 [J. Histochem. Cytochem. 60(8) , 620-9, (2012)] |
Construction of an amperometric ascorbate biosensor using ep...
2011-06-01 [Artif. Cells Blood Substit. Immobil. Biotechnol. 39(3) , 177-84, (2011)] |
Thoracic radicular vessels by simultaneous intra-arterial an...
2007-07-01 [Clin. Anat. 20(5) , 524-9, (2007)] |
Endothelin in the middle cerebral artery: a case of multiple...
2002-10-01 [Histochem. J. 34(10) , 469-77, (2002)] |
Effect of fixation and embedding on Raman spectroscopic anal...
2006-06-01 [Calcif. Tissue Int. 78(6) , 363-71, (2006)] |
Home | MSDS/SDS Database Search | Journals | Product Classification | Biologically Active Compounds | Selling Leads | About Us | Disclaimer
Copyright © 2024 ChemSrc All Rights Reserved